Subscribe to rss feed

Suggestion to re-orginize the propulsion workgroup forum | Suggestions and Questions | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

Suggestion to re-orginize the propulsion workgroup forum

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

1:41 pm
December 3, 2009


brmj

Rochester, New York, United States

Member

posts 402

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Post edited 12:08 am – December 4, 2009 by brmj


I would sugest having a seperate sub-forum for RCS systems, since the ones on the lander and maned capsule will have far more in common with eachother than they will with the main engine for either section.

Thoughts?

Main work groups: Propulsion (booster), Spacecraft Engineering, Computer Systems, Navigation and Guidance (software)

5:55 pm
December 3, 2009


Rocket-To-The-Moon

Altus, Oklahoma, USA

Member

posts 685

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Seems logical. The actual RCS thrusters and control valves will probably be identical between the two craft. The software that controls them will probably be the biggest difference.

Main Workgroups: Propulsion & Spacecraft Engineering

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
11 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 512
Posts: 3809

Membership:

There are 1133 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 348
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: jmwright, uhwuggawuh, seikialice88, bishvabis, alijayadv, harris

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16