Subscribe to rss feed

Suggestion to re-orginize the propulsion workgroup forum | Suggestions and Questions | Forum

You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

topic

Suggestion to re-orginize the propulsion workgroup forum

small tagNo Tags
UserPost

1:41 pm
December 3, 2009


brmj

Rochester, New York, United States

Member

posts 386

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Post edited 12:08 am – December 4, 2009 by brmj


I would sugest having a seperate sub-forum for RCS systems, since the ones on the lander and maned capsule will have far more in common with eachother than they will with the main engine for either section.

Thoughts?

Main work groups: Propulsion (booster), Spacecraft Engineering, Computer Systems, Navigation and Guidance (software)

5:55 pm
December 3, 2009


Rocket-To-The-Moon

Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA

Member

posts 666

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Seems logical. The actual RCS thrusters and control valves will probably be identical between the two craft. The software that controls them will probably be the biggest difference.

Main Workgroups: Propulsion & Spacecraft Engineering

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team forum

Most Users Ever Online: 28

Currently Online:
7 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 467
Posts: 3441

Membership:

There are 136 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 666
brmj – 386
rpulkrabek – 247
DenisG – 69
antinode – 45
noumena – 36

Recent New Members: gregmoran, Sci, jim_reaper, rwryne, Adrià López, shalrath

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1409 Posts), Rizwan (169 Posts)



  • Share/Bookmark