Subscribe to rss feed

NASA designs | Suggestions and Questions | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

NASA designs

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

7:26 am
January 13, 2010


maciejm

Australia

Member

posts 21

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I have read somewhere that NASA a government organisation is established to develop and test new technologies to provide private initiative with "know how". Does this mean that we should be able to access their designs?

How about buying spare parts for a shuttle (NASA will not need them any more), there is so much equipment that can be used. 

7:33 am
January 13, 2010


Rocket-To-The-Moon

Altus, Oklahoma, USA

Member

posts 685

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I'm not quite sure that I have heard of this. Any and all data that we can gather from a source like NASA could potentially be a large benefit if it is in a critical area that we need that info on.

I'm not sure how useful spare Shuttle parts would be for our designs. The parts that would be the most useful would be small valves, actuators, and sensors.

Main Workgroups: Propulsion & Spacecraft Engineering

7:41 am
January 13, 2010


maciejm

Australia

Member

posts 21

offline
link
print
3
+1
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I found complete handbook to Apollo.

Old, but relevant.

http://www.btinternet.com/~urs…..ndbook.pdf

7:42 am
January 13, 2010


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
4
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I can't think of much off the Shuttle that we could use (unless we wanted to build a large LOH/LH2 launch vehicle – that would certainly get ITAR's attention!).

Engines and tanks would be far too large for our needs.  The environmental control stuff would probably be designed to support large crews in large cabins.  I'm sure there would be good IMUs on board but we could just as easily buy those from, say, Crossbow.  Basically, the shuttle is built to a "big and expensive" philosophy, whereas we are going for "small and cheap".  Parts from one aren't often going to be compatible with the other.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

7:47 am
January 13, 2010


maciejm

Australia

Member

posts 21

offline
link
print
5
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Good point.

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
15 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 512
Posts: 3809

Membership:

There are 1133 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 348
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: jmwright, uhwuggawuh, seikialice88, bishvabis, alijayadv, harris

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16