Subscribe to rss feed

Idea: Electrostatic Lunar Mining | Suggestions and Questions | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

Idea: Electrostatic Lunar Mining

print
small tagrelated
UserPost

8:07 pm
September 3, 2010


Sci

Member

posts 10

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I had this idea a while back, and haven't seen it pop up anywhere else (though always willing to be proven wrong).

I recalled that one of the problems in the original moon missions was a build-up of lunar dust that was highly abrasive, being attracted to the astronauts and their equipment because it was photo-ionised.

I've seen the entries for NASA's lunar mining robot contest, and it occurred to me that this property might be exploited, and avoid readily wearing moving parts too!

I imagine a mining craft moving to a certain position and embedding a spike or auger into the bedrock to ground it, then extending either a directional funnel or "trunk" lined with panels to electro-statically attract the lunar dust. Essentially hoovering it up.

I suspect with careful design, electrical fields could at once draw the dust down the collector and repel it from it's surfaces. Possibly some sort of peristaltic motion.

 

Actually processing the dust is another matter entirely, though I have wondered since there is a hydrogen resonant frequency (as exploited in microwave cookers), there must be resonant frequencies for other elements. And perhaps in a low-gravity and electro-statically confined environment, this could be used to create some sort of microwave fractional distillation column?

Depending on the dust content though, perhaps it could simply be printed and sintered into 3D objects? Or a combination of the two; separating into various powders for more precise sintering, etc.

If the latter is possible, by combining both in one machine it could drastically reduce the amount of equipment requiring transport to the lunar surface to set up automated manufacture there.

Provider of practical solutions.

Sometimes stellifying Jupiter IS the practical solution.

10:03 pm
September 3, 2010


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I like the idea of electrostatic mining.  Quite a long time ago we spoke about electrostatics on the moon very briefly, in the context of dusting off suits etc. before getting back into a pressurised vehicle, but this is a much more interesting (though of course also more complicated) idea.

I don't know a tremendous amount about the various chemical and physical processes involved in most ISRU ideas.  I believe it is true that all the elements will have different resonant frequencies, I suppose the question is how high those frequencies get for the sorts of elements that are present in regolith, and whether generating RF at those frequencies would place realistic demands on power supply, etc.

ISRU is interesting in that, to some extent, it's something you can plan for and practice on Earth for (relatively) low cost.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

small tagrelated

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
11 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 516
Posts: 3818

Membership:

There are 1144 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 349
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: daffodil1003, lejufe, aquariusmediaa91, megasplosion, peterpaul008, Sandra

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16