Subscribe to rss feed

Scaling down spaceship for early launches | Spacecraft Engineering Workgroup | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

Scaling down spaceship for early launches

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

5:08 am
December 5, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I have been thinking more about the order in which the various aspects of the CLLARE project will progress.

Obviously the very first thing we will need to get working is the Selene 1 rocket.

Once this works it seems sensible to begin work on the space capsule since we could then do manned suborbital flights (unmanned test flights with dummy capsules first, of course).

It occurred to me that the capsule for these flights could be significantly scaled down from the "real deal".  Obviously it should be structurally identical, since we will want to make sure we have our designs right in that respect.  But many subsystems could be safely scaled down or even eliminated.

For instance, the early Mercury flights were often well under half an hour in duration.  I suspect that on that timescale, there is simply no need for CO2 scrubbing or humidity control, whereas those will be vital on the actual mission.  We will need communication gear on these early flights but it will not need to be powerful enough to work over lunar distances.  We will need navigation solutions, but accuracy will not be paramount and GPS will work for a considerable portion of the trip.

In other words, aside from the structure of the capsule itself, just about everything else could function in a reduced capacity.  This would make those early flights cheaper and easier (since it would keep down capsule mass).

However, we will need to consciously prepare for making this approach possible.  The decisions about whereabouts various systems are placed in the capsule (inside or outside of the internal pressure vessel, if we do go with that approach) and how they are connected together will have to be made such that we can effectively "chop and change" items about with as few consequences as possible.  I don't know to what extent this approach will be possible, but we should probably strive for it wherever we can.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
11 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 512
Posts: 3809

Membership:

There are 1133 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 348
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: jmwright, uhwuggawuh, seikialice88, bishvabis, alijayadv, harris

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16