Subscribe to rss feed

One stage or two? | Project planning and misc | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

One stage or two?

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

4:29 am
December 6, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

A fairly basic important design decision: do we want to do this with a one or two stage rocket?

Rocket Labs in NZ (who are the nearest case study to us, since they used a N2O oxidised hybrid engine) used a two stage rocket to get above 100km.

CSXT appear to have practically zero technical information about their rocket on their website, but it certainly looks one stage.

Obviously a single stage solution would be the simplest and hence the "most CSTART" way to do this, but if we assume that CSXT used a non-hybrid engine, or a hybrid engine with LOX oxidiser, it may be that they were only able to do this in one stage due to the increased thrust of a liquid engine or LOX hybrid.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

4:54 am
December 6, 2009


brmj

Rochester, New York, United States

Member

posts 402

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I checked, and CSXT used  a solid engine. Some of what is on their site implies that it is single stage, though I can't prove it.

Personally, I favor a single stage design for simplicity and because we will need to be able to build really big engines for any of this to work, anyway.

Main work groups: Propulsion (booster), Spacecraft Engineering, Computer Systems, Navigation and Guidance (software)

7:28 am
December 6, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
3
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

If they really did use a solid engine, I am all the more impressed at their achievement!  And all the more confident that we can do this in a single stage.  In light of this, I can't see any compelling argument to go with a two stage design (other than, perhaps, to get experience with staging).

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

8:42 am
December 6, 2009


Rocket-To-The-Moon

Altus, Oklahoma, USA

Member

posts 685

offline
link
print
4
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Post edited 3:06 pm – December 6, 2009 by Rocket-To-The-Moon


Yes CSXT used a single stage solid motor. I saw a good video about it that explained its flight profile. I'll be right back with that.

I must have imagined that video. Here is a picture of the rockets flight profile. Basically the motor burns with very high thrust for a matter of seconds. The rocket reached 6,800km/h in 10 seconds (19.26g acceleration) and then coasted upward for an additional 60 kilometers.

csxt flight diagram

Main Workgroups: Propulsion & Spacecraft Engineering

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
11 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 516
Posts: 3818

Membership:

There are 1144 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 349
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: daffodil1003, lejufe, aquariusmediaa91, megasplosion, peterpaul008, Sandra

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16