Subscribe to rss feed

On orbit inclinations during lunar transferr | Orbits and burns | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

On orbit inclinations during lunar transferr

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

6:41 am
December 16, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Here's a detail we have brushed over in our planning so far.

The Earth-moon orbital plane is not the same as the Earth's equatorial plane.  The difference between the two plans varies from 18.29° and 28.58° as the Earth wobbles.

We have three broad options:

  • Launch our CM into a parking orbit aligned with the Earth's equatorial plane (taking full advantage of the Earth's rotation) and then perform an orbital inclination change maneuver, which is expensive, to put the CM into a second parking orbit aligned with the Earth-moon orbital plane.  Then we can perform TLI to get to the moon.
  • Launch our CM into a parking orbit aligned with the Earth-moon orbital plane (which would involve "fighting" against the Earth's rotation a bit).  Then we can perform TLI to get to the moon.
  • Launch our CM into a parking orbit aligned with the Earth's equatorial plane (taking full advantage of the Earth's rotation) and then performing TLI in that plane with very careful timing so that the CM meets the moon during one of the two points on the moon's orbit where the moon intersects the Earth's equatorial plane.

The third option is the most fuel efficient (we do not have to perform an expensive orbit inclination change and we do not have to fight the Earth's rotation) but the least flexible with regards to timing – we would only have 2 launch opportunities in each month (corresponding to the two intersection points) and an unexpected delay of only an hour or so (maybe, we'd have to crunch the numbers) might result in a launch scrub.

I don't know which of the first two options would be the easiest / most fuel efficient.  I suspect the first would be most efficient, but this could be wrong.

In addition to affecting the size and frequency of our launch windows on Earth, our decision on this matter will affect our choice of landing site.  We don't want to have to waste fuel once in lunar orbit doing an inclination change so we will want to land somewhere roughly directly underneath the orbit we find ourselves in after the lunar capture burn.  Depending on whether or not we end up orbiting the Earth on the Earth-equatorial plane or the Earth-moon plane, we will have a different area to scout for potential landing sites.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

10:43 pm
December 16, 2009


brmj

Rochester, New York, United States

Member

posts 402

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I would like to point out that with the third option, if we had it orbit the earth a bit before doing TLI, we could extend our launch window enough to deal with short delays by reducing our number of earth orbits.

As a fourth option, we could do something much like option three, but with an arbitrary orbital plane and land wherever we wanted. This wouldn't be particularly fuel efficient, but if we wanted to land in some spot that the other options would prehiit, such as a polar crater or something, we'd need to.

Finally, another consideration for this should be what orbits it is easy to do a low energy transfer to. I don't know what our options are for that yet, but I do know that the Earth-Moon plane seems to be an easy one. I'll read the low energy transfer book a bit more and see if I can figure it out.

Main work groups: Propulsion (booster), Spacecraft Engineering, Computer Systems, Navigation and Guidance (software)

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
11 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 516
Posts: 3818

Membership:

There are 1144 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 349
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: daffodil1003, lejufe, aquariusmediaa91, megasplosion, peterpaul008, Sandra

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16