Subscribe to rss feed

Gyro | Navigation | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

Gyro

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

2:37 am
November 17, 2009


rpulkrabek

Member

posts 348

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I don't understand much about accelerometers or gyroscopes, I just know that it's possible to extract data from them. I was trying to think how would an accelerometer be used in space when there isn't a gravitational field to give a reference position, such as, which way is up. I then heard that gyroscopes would be better. Well, I still don't know much about gyroscopes, but I am hoping this link can point somebody in the right direction. It's about a company that is releasing for sale gyroscopes to be used in cell phones and such.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/1…..evel-of-c/

3:06 am
November 17, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Inertial nagivation requires both accelerometers *and* gyroscopes.   It's quite easy to find packages which include both instruments inside a single physical housing.  The gyroscopes can measure angular acceleration – integrating this twice (if done with proper filtering) is sufficient to determine orientation in the absence of a gravitational field, so that software knows which direction the accelerometer readings correspond to.

If you are interested in knowing more about this there are some excellent references at the NGW suggested reading page in the wiki – try "an introduction to inertial navigation".

Btw: I've moved this to the nagivation subforum.  The convention seems to be that "navigation" is figuring out where you are, and "guidance" is getting yourself somewhere you want to be.  In our context, navigation is accelerometers, gyroscopes, radio doppler measurements, etc., and guidance is making orientation/velocity adjustments with RCS to keep ourselves on track.  If people feel like this isn't the appropriate way to use these terms I am happy to discuss that, but this usage seems most in keeping with what I read around the web (I'm certainly not an expert on these issues).

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
14 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 512
Posts: 3809

Membership:

There are 1133 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 348
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: jmwright, uhwuggawuh, seikialice88, bishvabis, alijayadv, harris

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16