Subscribe to rss feed

Extravehicular transfer in Soviet moon plan | Mission Planning Workgroup | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

Extravehicular transfer in Soviet moon plan

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

7:17 am
December 29, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

An interesting find:  I was reading the Wikipedia article on the Soviet's planned lunar lander and I noticed that "It had no docking tunnel like the LM's; the cosmonaut had to space walk from the LOK (Soyuz 7K-L3) Command Ship to the LK and back".  The LK was apparently tested several times in Earth orbit – the article does not explicitly say that this testing included an EVA from the Soyuz to the LK, but one would have to assume that it did.  This provides something of a precedent for our extravehicular transfer plan, which is reassuring.  I was worried that it was a risky thing to make an integral part of our plan, but apparently it can and has been done.

The LK had a few other similarities to our proposed plan, although they are fairly superficial: it carried a crew of one, as opposed to Apollo's two, and it used the same engine for ascent and descent instead of Apollo's two-stage lander.  It's a shame the Soviet moon plan is not better publically documented.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

8:34 am
December 29, 2009


Rocket-To-The-Moon

Altus, Oklahoma, USA

Member

posts 685

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I think that a space walk is a perfectly practical way to transfer from one vehicle to the other. Considering that our lander is open one would have to space walk no matter what.

If we do decide to to some sort of magnetic soft docking then everything will be rigid enough to crawl around without too much hassle.

Main Workgroups: Propulsion & Spacecraft Engineering

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
10 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 512
Posts: 3809

Membership:

There are 1133 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 348
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: jmwright, uhwuggawuh, seikialice88, bishvabis, alijayadv, harris

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16