Subscribe to rss feed

Questions about atmosphere maintenance | Life Support Workgroup | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

Questions about atmosphere maintenance

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

5:28 pm
January 6, 2010


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

I'm trying to clarify my understanding of what needs to be onboard the CM to facilitate 24 hours of breathable atmosphere for the astronaut, I'm going to run through how I think it works here, if anybody can point out anything I've missed, I'd appreciate.

So, first off, pressurising the CM with 100% oxygen is bad – fires will start more easily, spread more quickly and burn more hotly, as learned from Apollo 1.  So we pressurise the CM with something like 20% oxygen 80% nitrogen, which is roughly the composition of regular old Earth air.

So at the very beginning of the mission, the cabin contains 80% nitrogen, 20% oxygen.

With each breath the astronaut takes, their lungs fill with 80% nitrogen, 20% oxygen.  The nitrogen doesn't interact with the body at all, it just gets breathed straight back out, right?  But some of the oxygen is absorbed through the lungs and also some carbon dioxide is expelled.  So, as the mission progresses, the nitrogen level of cabin remains entirely constant.  Oxygen levels slowly go down and at the same time carbon dioxide levels slowly go up.  Is this accurate?

If this is how it works, then, all we need to do is inject fresh O2 to replace what has been used and remove CO2 before it builds up too much.

Until we do an EVA, where we vent the entire cabin.  After EVA, in order to repressurise, we need another 80% of the cabin volume of nitrogen and 20% of that volume of oxygen.

So, in the cylinders behind the pressure vessel we need to store nitrogen and oxygen, and in order to know how much we have to rate the cabin for not only a number of hours of occupancy but also a number of EVAs.  24 hours seems like a good occupancy rating, what about EVAs?  Just the one?

Even if we go with just the one EVA, I suspect we'll end up having to store a lot more nitrogen than oxygen.  There are 3 tanks behind the pressure vessel in the concept diagrams, although of course that is merely conceptual.  Maybe one oxygen tank in the middle and two nitrogen tanks either side would let us store what we need and maintain symmetry?  Or does it make more sense to store tanks of our actual 80/20 mix to use for repressurising after EVA, and also a tank of straight O2 for injection?

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

8:27 pm
January 6, 2010


Rocket-To-The-Moon

Altus, Oklahoma, USA

Member

posts 685

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Post edited 2:27 am – January 7, 2010 by Rocket-To-The-Moon


I don't think that it will actually take too much nitrogen to pressurize the cabin. The initial launch configuration can just contain sea level air which can provide the base atmosphere until the first depressurization. During the cruse out the nitrogen supply can be used to maintain pressure should there be minuscule leaks. I think that we were talking about using approximately .7atm pressure in the capsule (equivalent to 10,000 feet pressure altitude, an altitude that marks the boundary between hypoxia and normal oxygen saturation) which means that the volume of nitrogen required is somewhat less than one would think. Even a very small tank of N at a sufficiently high pressure could repressurize the capsule. 

I think that the idea of just trickeling in oxygen as our CO2 scrubber removes that gas is logical. Just put in enough oxygen so that the partial pressure remains at the correct level.

Main Workgroups: Propulsion & Spacecraft Engineering

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
9 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 512
Posts: 3809

Membership:

There are 1133 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 348
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: jmwright, uhwuggawuh, seikialice88, bishvabis, alijayadv, harris

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16