Subscribe to rss feed

Space tourism | Fundraising and sponsorship issues | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

Space tourism

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

8:40 pm
November 16, 2009


brmj

Rochester, New York, United States

Member

posts 402

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Ijust realized that even if we end up going with commercial launch vehicles we could probably do a lunar flyby or perhaps even a landing for less than twice what people are paying for trips to the ISS. This is bassed on $20 to $35 million flights to the ISS and a projected launch cost of $35 million on a Falcon 9, which will lift 10,450 kg to LEO and is intended to be man rated. That ought to be more than enough mass, and potentially enough to launch our lander for the next mission on the same rocket, or maybe even enough to go with an Apollo-like design and bring the lander with us for that mission.

I think this might be an excellent source of funding in the future. Thoughts?

Main work groups: Propulsion (booster), Spacecraft Engineering, Computer Systems, Navigation and Guidance (software)

9:07 pm
November 16, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Very much agreed.  I have always assumed that as soon as we could safely be sending people into space, we'd start doing it for money.  Granted, all I had in mind for now were suborbital and LEO flights (since we'll have to practice these lots ourselves before the lunar mission anyway), but it makes no sense not to do lunar stuff as well (using a free return trajectory the trip would be pretty straight forward).  I do think this would require a second spacecraft design since our current ones are for one person only and I think it would be advisable to have a properly trained pilot onboard, but it could basically just be an enlargened version of our one person craft.

We *really* need names for these things, to make them easier to discuss!

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

10:37 am
November 19, 2009


josh

Member

posts 11

offline
link
print
3
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Post edited 4:38 pm – November 19, 2009 by josh


how bout  F.I.R.S.T  first independent  return space tourism?

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
10 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 515
Posts: 3816

Membership:

There are 1140 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 349
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: megasplosion, peterpaul008, Sandra, melody, devinbutler30, Manoj Kumar

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16