| User | Post |
|
7:49 pm November 30, 2009
| brmj
| | Rochester, New York, United States | |
| Member | posts 402 | |
|
|
This may be a kind of wild idea, but I'm wondering if we could do something strang to drasticly increase the CM's drag for re-entry to decrease the demands on the heat sheild. Perhaps either an inflatable or umbrella-like structure to increase the capsule's frontal area or some sort of weird, specialized parachute for the outer reaches of the atmousphere. Thoughts?
|
Main work groups: Propulsion (booster), Spacecraft Engineering, Computer Systems, Navigation and Guidance (software)
|
|
|
9:11 pm November 30, 2009
| Rocket-To-The-Moon
| | Altus, Oklahoma, USA | |
| Member | posts 685 | |
|
|
Post edited 3:23 am – December 1, 2009 by Rocket-To-The-Moon
I was thinking of something like this earlier. We would need a variable system so that we could have very high drag (parachute type device) that is deployed at a very high altitude (120km+). Even though the atmosphere is thin at these altitudes it would help to scrub some of the energy. There could then be a shear pin in the line that would automatically shear when the capsule reaches a certain g force (7-9g for example). Once the shear pin breaks the chute is lost and the capsule returns to a much lower acceleration (1-2g) due entirely to the drag of the capsule itself. The acceleration will continue to build up as the atmosphere becomes more dense at lower altitudes but hopefully it is much less than if there was no high altitude drag chute.
If the parachute had some kind of variable drag coefficient (by opening the hole in the center) we could keep the vehicle at a continuous maximum acceleration until the capsule's drag alone equals the maximum at which point the chute would be cut. This would let us take advantage of the parachute longer instead of cutting (shearing it) it once the acceleration builds to a certain point. The downside is that it is more complex since we would have to modulate the parachute as a function of spacecraft acceleration which doesn't coincide with "the simplest thing that could possibly work".
Is this what you had in mind?
Edit: To clarify, the parachute is providing drag when there is little aerodynamic heating of the capsule.
|
Main Workgroups: Propulsion & Spacecraft Engineering
|
|
|
9:53 am December 1, 2009
| brmj
| | Rochester, New York, United States | |
| Member | posts 402 | |
|
|
Yeah, that's one variant of what I was thinking, and probably the most sensible one.
One secondary advantidge of this is that it will insure that the spacecraft reeneters facing the right direction.
|
Main work groups: Propulsion (booster), Spacecraft Engineering, Computer Systems, Navigation and Guidance (software)
|
|
|
9:13 am December 22, 2009
| Luke Maurits
| | Adelaide, Australia | |
| Admin
| posts 1483 | |
|
|
Maybe a large ballute would be good for this plan?
|
Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.
|
|
|
2:21 am December 26, 2009
| brmj
| | Rochester, New York, United States | |
| Member | posts 402 | |
|
|
Good find. That might be a good idea.
|
Main work groups: Propulsion (booster), Spacecraft Engineering, Computer Systems, Navigation and Guidance (software)
|
|