Subscribe to rss feed

Concept diagram of command module configurations | Command module design | Forum

 
You must be logged in to post user permissions login Login register Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


searchicon 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

topic

Concept diagram of command module configurations

print
small tagNo Tags
UserPost

1:49 pm
December 20, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
1
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Here's a simple but hopefully useful diagram I made to show off the concept proposed a while ago (and which I think is a really promising one) of using different stacked modules to give the CM a range of mission profiles.  It makes it quite clear how we can use the one spacecraft to essentially perform the role of the first 3 US manned spacecraft.

mouse

Comments very welcome.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

2:58 pm
December 20, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
2
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Obviously if we went with this approach we would want to design a completely standard attachment and separation mechanism for modules to stack behind the CM.  This way we could come up with entirely new module ideas years later and have them work just fine with existing CLLARE hardware (although I'm not sure what other modules we may come up with – maybe scientific payloads?).

This presents us with a rather solid and tractable engineering problem that people can sink their teeth into right off the bat.  Once we specify the diameter of the CM people can just start working on this with minimal other information.  Obviously the Gemini familiarisation manual would be a good place to look for ideas although, as always, we should innovate if we can.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

7:10 am
December 21, 2009


Rocket-To-The-Moon

Altus, Oklahoma, USA

Member

posts 685

offline
link
print
3
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Very nice Luke. I'll be giving some thought about how to mate the different modules. Most of the load will be due to acceleration so the most important thing is that we keep everything aligned.

We will also have to give considerable thought about how everything will be routed between the CM and the support modules.

Main Workgroups: Propulsion & Spacecraft Engineering

7:19 am
December 21, 2009


Luke Maurits

Adelaide, Australia

Admin

posts 1483

offline
link
print
4
0
ratedowngrey
rateupgrey

Rocket-To-The-Moon said:

We will also have to give considerable thought about how everything will be routed between the CM and the support modules.


This will definitely be a challenge.  It would be awesome if we could come up with a sufficiently general solution that we could attach multiple extension modules and buses to a single CM, although not necessary by any means.

Main CLLARE workgroups: Mission Planning, Navigation and Guidance. I do maths, physics, C, Python and Java.

small tagNo Tags

About the CSTART – Collaborative Space Travel and Research Team Forum

Forum Timezone: UTC -6

Most Users Ever Online: 59

Currently Online:
14 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4
Forums: 36
Topics: 512
Posts: 3809

Membership:

There are 1133 Members

There are 2 Admins

Top Posters:

Rocket-To-The-Moon – 685
brmj – 402
rpulkrabek – 348
DenisG – 69
antinode – 64
J. Simmons – 46

Recent New Members: jmwright, uhwuggawuh, seikialice88, bishvabis, alijayadv, harris

Administrators: Luke Maurits (1483 Posts), Rizwan (170 Posts)



 
share save 120 16